Posts Tagged ‘fossils’

They Say They Found The Missing Link

October 7, 2009

Does this look like your grandma?

Ape Man

Ape Man

The evolution propaganda says this is your family.  Do you think this is where YOU came from?  Instead of God made you for a divine purpose?

Advertisements

No Fossils Older Than 600 Million Years

June 6, 2008

Still moore prove the hideous lie of evolution is false.  We new that already, but its good to share these things when they come up so when other good Christians get cornerd by athiests we no how to react.  There gonna lie to you, but a lot of them mean well.  A lot of people are athiest because they don’t no any better but these people ar open to reason so if you point out why these things are lies theyll listen.  Theyll no better, and stop telling the lie to more Christians.

Imagine what kind of world we can make!  When people go back an tell whoevr lied to them how they foun out, prety soon well get all he evolution propaganda out of schools!  And stop brianwashing kids!

There are no fossil records more than 60,000,000 years old. Dont take my word for it, its in that evil Richardo Dawkins book my frind read.  Or on Wikipeda.  Dorkins hisself said it looks just like if God made a hole bunch of living things and put them on earth, out of the blue.  Just like it says in the Bible!!  But no, he’s a scientist what hates God, so he needs to find some stupid way that didn’t happen for all these thigns to get there, even tho its obvious God made them, and even all the scientific evidence shows that.
Read the rest of this entry »

Fossil People Footprints And Dinosaurs Found Together

May 28, 2008

Well this proves Creation, doesn’t it?  It showes that people and dinosaurs lived together.  Probly they were running to catch Noah’s Ark, that’s what it says in the paper.

Well if dinosors were killed 80 million years ago by a comet or whatever, and mamels showed up like 5 milion years ago, it would be impossible for them to walk togethr.  But they did, and the fossil record shows it.  This proofs evolution is false, and the “naturalistics” opinion is false.

Could they be mad later?  Sure, I wondered that to when I heard about it.  Only, these were made in the mud, and mud drys real fast.  So it couldn’t be.

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/taylor-trail.htm

Sciene is proving Christianity.
Read the rest of this entry »

Debunking THEORY of evolution

April 14, 2008

Evolution has been oficially debunked.

Alow me to share some quotes from you. Remember thse are from who athiests think are smart people. They went to colege and everything. Some of them are doctors. Not the kind that heal people though but the kind of doctor who usually lies about sience to recruit children to athiesm. But some Christians became wise in the way of sceince and found all the problem in the theory of evolution.

Read the section calld “Evolutionary theory and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation‎” and see what you think now! Stephen Gould is a scientist and he said “the best ‘evidences’ for Darwin’s theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked.” It’s right their and they have fotnotes. Four people.

Even Darwin hisself wrote that “When we descend to details, we cannot prove that a single species has changed; nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the theory.” (CHARLES DARWIN THE ATHIEST GOD)

What that mean is their are no transitional fosil records. They had 140 years to find even just one but they cant. Because God didn’t make one. So without evidance these people made up the idea of a cow that got up and walked. No, I’m not making that up. Go read the thing you’ll be shocked at what kinds of garbag these people make up and tell each other about. Their teaching this stuff in all the public schools so you should send your children to a private school.

So let’s look at th science paleobabble:

Ernst Mayr wrote: “It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations.”

He said mutants are bad and die real yung so thy don’t have kids.

And also he said life is just way to complexated to not b from God.

Dr. Jonathan Sarfati states the following in relation to the diluted definition of the word “evolution”: “ …many evolutionary propagandists are guilty of the deceitful practice of equivocation, that is, switching the meaning of a single word (evolution) part way through an argument. A common tactic, ‘bait-and-switch,’ is simply to produce examples of change over time, call this ‘evolution,’ then imply that the GTE [General Theory of Evolution] is thereby proven or even essential, and creation disproved. The PBS Evolution series and the Scientific American article are full of examples of this fallacy.

Bate and swich is illegal, except when it’s used to attack Christian faith!

Dr. Walt Brown states the genetic material that controls the biological processes of life is coded information and that human experience tells us that codes are created only by the result of intelligence and not merely by processes of nature.

See? It has to be God!

In the peer reviewed biology journal Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington Dr. Stephen Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms and proposed an intelligent cause as the best explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa. The editor of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Dr. Richard Sternberg, came under intense scutiny and persecution for the aforementioned article published by Dr. Meyer.

I told u their’s persecution of Christians!

The history of organic life is indemonstrable; we cannot prove a whole lot in evolutionary biology, and our findings will always be hypothesis. There is one true evolutionary history of life, and whether we will actually ever know it is not likely. Most importantly, we have to think about questioning underlying assumptions, whether we are dealing with molecules or anything else.” – Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Professor of Biological Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, February 9, 200

It’s not even sience!